Lawsuit: Google instructed YouTube to cancel interviews with applicants who werent female, black or Hispanic, and to "purge entirely" the applications of people who didn't fit those categories





HOW TO GET RID OF AND PLACE YOUTUBE


We have had this discussion before and the problem is obvious. It costs 6 gorilion $. But....what if, for starters you only permitted political commentators who had over 50 000 subscribers on youtube? At the very minimum, they wouldn't need storage, just bandwidth.

Then when audience gathers, allow any person with 50 000 subs even if their content is non political. As the audience expands, and the add revenue comes in, lower the limit to 10 000.

The same thing could be done with twitter. That shirthole never made a cent anyway so it would be limited to "BIG" political commentators only at first for twitter wars. Then all "BIG" users. Then........

And maybe we just let it civilization collapse while hiding in the hills and sniping anything we see that is non white....good times.

Edit: no, the RightWingTube doesn't mean that leftist scum would be censored with the intention of creating an echo chamber, tho with freedom to say what you mean it would probably eventually turn into one in a similar manner that voat did. But that would not be the goal.





Lawsuit: Google instructed YouTube to cancel interviews with applicants who weren't female, black or Hispanic, and to "purge entirely" the applications of people who didn't fit those categories (archive.fo)

submitted  ago by Arrvee to news (+17|-0)

Google accused of excluding Asians, whites for some positions

Google accused of excluding Asians, whites for some positions (cnet.com)

submitted  ago by Donnie46 to news (+12|-0)

YouTube Hiring For Some Positions Excluded White and Asian Males, Lawsuit says

A former employee alleges tech firm set quotas for hiring minorities

A Google spokeswoman said the company will vigorously defend itself in the lawsuit against YouTube.
A Google spokeswoman said the company will vigorously defend itself in the lawsuit against YouTube. PHOTO: JAAP ARRIENS/ZUMA PRESS
By 
Kirsten Grind and
 
Douglas MacMillan
YouTube last year stopped hiring white and Asian males for technical positions because they didn’t help the world’s largest video site achieve its goals for improving diversity, according to a civil lawsuit filed by a former employee.
The lawsuit, filed by Arne Wilberg, a white male who worked at Google for nine years, including four years as a recruiter at YouTube, alleges the division of Alphabet Inc.’s GOOGL -2.94% Google set quotas for hiring minorities. Last spring, YouTube recruiters were allegedly instructed to cancel interviews with applicants who weren’t female, black or Hispanic, and to “purge entirely” the applications of people who didn’t fit those categories, the lawsuit claims.
A Google spokeswoman said the company will vigorously defend itself in the lawsuit. “We have a clear policy to hire candidates based on their merit, not their identity,” she said in a statement. “At the same time, we unapologetically try to find a diverse pool of qualified candidates for open roles, as this helps us hire the best people, improve our culture, and build better products.”
People familiar with YouTube’s and Google’s hiring practices in interviews corroborated some of the lawsuit’s allegations, including the hiring freeze of white and Asian technical employees, and YouTube’s use of quotas.
Workforce breakdown by race
Asian
White
Hispanic
Multiracial
Black
2%
4%
Google
35%
56%
4%
4%
2%
Microsoft
6%
31%
56%
3%
3%
Facebook
5%
49%
40%
4%
1%
Intel
48%
38%
9%
Workforce breakdown by gender
Female
Male
Google
31%
69%
Microsoft*
74%
26%
Facebook*
65%
35%
Intel
26%
74%
*Includes employees outside U.S. Note: Numbers may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Source: the companies
YouTube Hiring For Some Positions Excluded White and Asian Males, Lawsuit says
Mr. Wilberg’s lawsuit, filed in January in California’s San Mateo County Superior Court, alleges that Google discriminated against him for his sex and race, retaliated by firing him when he complained, and in the process violated antidiscrimination laws. Mr. Wilberg declined to comment through his attorney.
The lawsuit highlights the tension facing the technology industry as it tries to boost minority hiring, a stated goal of many large companies, including Google. It also threatens to ignite simmering controversy about Silicon Valley’s politics and whether its predominantly liberal ideology is affecting how companies operate.
Google in particular has found itself in the middle of the gender debate following dueling lawsuits in January, one that alleged the company discriminated against women, the other claiming discrimination against conservative white men. The latter suit was filed by plaintiff James Damore, an engineer who was fired from the company last year for distributing a memo that suggested men were better suited to certain tech jobs than women. Google has said it disagrees with the allegations in those suits.
Mr. Wilberg, 40, alleges he complained to multiple managers at YouTube about its hiring practices over the past two years, and elevated those complaints to Google managers before he was ultimately fired last November.
Employers are allowed to undertake initiatives to promote diversity hiring, employment lawyers say. But under Title VII, the federal antidiscrimination law, employers aren’t allowed to make hiring decisions based on race and gender among other protected classes. That means they can’t employ practices like hiring quotas based on race or only hiring one type of minority candidate, attorneys say. Such practices would also run afoul of California laws.
—Yoree Koh contributed to this article.